Compstar Insurance Services, LLC v. Summit Specialty Insurance Solutions LLC

District Court, C.D. California·Decided August 27, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-01096·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 9 10 COMPSTAR INSURANCE Case No. 2:25-cv-01096-CAS-AGR SERVICES, LLC, a California 11 corporation; and BENCHMARK INSURANCE COMPANY, a Kansas STIPULATED PROTECTIVE 12 corporation, ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, Judge: Hon. Christina A. Snyder 14 v. Magistrate: Hon. Alicia G. Rosenberg 15 SUMMIT SPECIALTY INSURANCE Complaint Filed: 02/07/2025 SOLUTIONS LLC, a California limited 16 liability company; BLAKE BAKER, an individual; CANDACE LONG, and 17 individual; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 3 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 4 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 5 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 6 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 7 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 8 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 9 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 10 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 11 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 12 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them 13 to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 14 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a 15 party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 16 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 17 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and 18 other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 19 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 20 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such 21 confidential and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other 22 things, confidential business or financial information, information regarding 23 confidential business practices, or other confidential research, development, or 24 commercial information (including information implicating privacy rights of third 25 parties), information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may 26 be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal 27 statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the 1 confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect information the 2 parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted 3 reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of 4 trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of 5 justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the 6 intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for 7 tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that 8 it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good 9 cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 10 2. DEFINITIONS 11 2.1 Action: this pending federal law suit. 12 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation 13 of information or items under this Order. 14 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 15 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 16 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 17 the Good Cause Statement. 18 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 19 their support staff). 20 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 21 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 22 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 24 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 25 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 26 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 27 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 1 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 3 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 4 counsel. 5 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 6 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party 8 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 9 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which 10 has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 11 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 12 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 13 support staffs). 14 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 15 Discovery Material in this Action. 16 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support 17 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 18 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 19 and their employees and subcontractors. 20 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 21 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 22 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 23 from a Producing Party. 24 3. SCOPE 25 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 26 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 27 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 1 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 2 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 3 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 4 4. DURATION 5 Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the information that was designated as 6 confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public and 7 will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, 8 unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed 9 otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City 10 and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing 11 “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from 12 “compelling reasons” standard when merits-related documents are part of court 13 record). Accordingly, the terms of this protective order do not extend beyond the 14 commencement of the trial. 15 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 16 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 17 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 18 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 19 qualifies under the appropriate standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Compstar Insurance Services, LLC v. Summit Specialty Insurance Solutions LLC, (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Compstar Insurance Services, LLC v. Summit Specialty Insurance Solutions LLC (Compstar Insurance Services, LLC v. Summit Specialty Insurance Solutions LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heft v. Ogle
18 A. 19 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889)