Comprehensive Filmtreat, Inc. v. C & M Film Service, Inc.
This text of 30 A.D.2d 961 (Comprehensive Filmtreat, Inc. v. C & M Film Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered May 20, 1968, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondent. Order entered November 22, 1967, unanimously modified on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, so as to permit discovery and inspection, pursuant to item numbered “1 ” of the notice dated October 26, 1967, but limited to visual inspection only, and delete from such notice item numbered “ 2 ”, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In view of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and the extensive examinations already had, it is difficult to sense prejudice by granting a visual inspection only with respect to this item “ 1 ”. Before the establishment of liability the granting of permission to inspect “copies of all invoices” is premature. (Griffin Mfg. Co., v. Gold Dust Corp., 245 App. Div. 385.) Concur — Steuer, J, P., Tilzer, McGivern, Rabin and McNally, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.D.2d 961, 294 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3007, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comprehensive-filmtreat-inc-v-c-m-film-service-inc-nyappdiv-1968.