Complot v. Rushmore Servicing LLC

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 20, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-01918·Unknown

Opinion

1 SEAN B. KIRBY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14224 2 TROUTMAN PEPPER HAMILTON SANDERS LLP 3 8985 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 200 Las Vegas, NV 89123 (Nevada Office) 4 Fax: (404) 962-6800 Tele: (470) 832-6017 5 sean.kirby@troutman.com 6 Attorneys for Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC 7 dba Mr. Cooper (erroneously sued as Rushmore Servicing LLC doing business for Nationstar 8 Mortgage LLC) 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 OLIVER COMPLOT, Case No.: 2:24-CV-01918-JCM-BNW 13 Plaintiff, 14 DISCOVERY PLAN AND vs. SCHEDULING ORDER 15 RUSHMORE SERVICING LLC DOING BUSINESS FOR NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE 16 LLC, Judge: Hon. Judge James C. Mahan 17 Defendant. Magistrate: Hon. Judge Brenda Weksler 18 Complaint Filed: September 23, 2024 Trial Date: NoneSet 19 20 21 Plaintiff Oliver Complot (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC dba Mr. 22 Cooper(erroneously sued as Rushmore Servicing LLC doing business for Nationstar Mortgage LLC) 23 (“Defendant”) (collectively, the Parties”), hereby submit their Joint Proposed Discovery Plan and 24 Scheduling Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, as well as LR II 26-1. It is 25 hereby requested that the Court enter the following Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. 26 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and LR 26-1(a), a telephonic meeting was held on December 27 19, 2024. 28 /// 1 I. WhethertheParties have exchanged initial disclosurestatements underRule26(a) 2 The Parties have not exchanged Initial Disclosures. The Parties have agreed to exchange 3 Initial Disclosures no later than January 2, 2025, fourteen (14) days after the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) 4 Conference. 5 II. Discovery Cut-OffDate 6 Discovery will take 150 days, measured from the date of the scheduling conference which 7 was on 12/19/2024. The Discovery Cut-Offdate,therefore, will be June1, 2025. 8 TheParties have proposed dates that conform with Local Rule26.1(b). 9 III. Amending thePleadings and Adding Parties 10 PursuanttoLR26-1(b)(2),thedeadlineforfilingMotionstoAmendthePleadingsorMotions 11 toAddPartiesis90daysbeforethecloseofdiscovery,thereforethedeadlinewillbeMarch3,2025. 12 IV. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) Disclosures (Experts) 13 Pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(3), unless the Discovery Plan otherwise provides and the court so 14 orders, the deadlines in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) for Expert Disclosures are modified to require 15 that the disclosures be made 60 days before the Discovery Cut-Off date and that Rebuttal-Expert 16 Disclosures bemade30 days aftertheinitial disclosureofexperts. 17 Expert Disclosures deadlinewill be April 2, 2025. 18 Rebuttal Expert Disclosures deadline will beMay 2, 2025. 19 V. DispositiveMotions 20 Pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(4), unless the Discovery Plan otherwise provides and the court so 21 orders, thedeadlinefor filing DispositiveMotionsis30 days afterthe Discovery Cut-Offdate. 22 Therefore,the deadline forfiling DispositiveMotions isJuly 1, 2025. 23 VI. Pretrial Order 24 Pursuant to LR 26-1(b)(5), unless the Discovery Plan otherwise provides and the court so 25 orders, the deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order is 30 days after the deadline for filing Dispositive 26 Motions. 27 If no Dispositive Motions are filed, the deadline for the Joint Pretrial Order, Fed. R. Civ. P. 1 If Dispositive Motions are filed, the deadline for filing the Joint Pretrial Order, Fed. R. Civ. 2 P. 26(a)(3) Disclosures, and any Objections to them will be suspended until 30 days after decision 3 on theDispositiveMotions or further court order. 4 VII. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) Disclosures 5 In accordance with LR 26-1(b)(6), the Disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and 6 any Objections to them must beincluded in theJoint Pretrial Order. 7 If Dispositive Motions are filed, the deadline for filing the Joint Pretrial Order, Fed. R. Civ. 8 P. 26(a)(3) Disclosures, and any Objections to them will be suspended until 30 days after decision 9 on theDispositiveMotions or further court order. 10 VIII. AlternativeDisputeResolution 11 The Parties certify that they met and conferred about the possibility of using alternative 12 dispute-resolution processes including mediation, arbitration, and if applicable, early neutral 13 evaluation, but havenot cometo any agreement at this time. 14 The assistance of a Magistrate Judge in facilitating a settlement conference after the Parties 15 engage in initial discovery may be useful. The parties believe early neutral evaluation would be 16 beneficial. 17 IX. AlternativeForms of Case Disposition 18 ThePartiesfurthercertifythattheyconsidered consenttoTrialbyaUnitedStatesMagistrate 19 Judgeunder28U.S.C.§636(c)andFed.R.Civ.P.73andtheuseoftheShortTrialProgram(General 20 Order2013-01). 21 TheParties do not consent to trial by aUnitedStates Magistrate. 22 TheParties do not consent to the useoftheShort Trial Program (General Order2013-01). 23 X. Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”)andElectronicEvidence 24 The Parties certify that they intend to present evidence in electronic format to jurors for the 25 purposes of jury deliberations. The Parties will consult the Court’s website or contact the assigned 26 judge’s courtroom administrator for instructions about how to prepare evidence in an electronic 27 format and other requirements fortheCourt’s electronicjury evidencedisplay system. 1 The Parties have discussed the retention and production of electronic data. The Parties agree 2 that service of discovery via electronic means, including electronic files copied to compact disc, 3 pursuanttoFed.R.Civ.5(b),issufficient,andthePartiesretaintherighttoservebymailandreceive 4 threeadditional days for mailing providedforin Fed. R. Civ.P. 6(d). TheParties reserve the right to 5 revisitthisissueifadisputeorneedarises.ThePartiesfurtherintendtopresentevidenceinelectronic 6 formattojurorsforthepurposesofjurydeliberations.Totheextentdiscoveryrequestsareservedon 7 a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, service will be deemed effective on the next day that is not a 8 Saturday, Sunday, orlegal holiday. 9 XI. Protection ofPrivileged/Trial Preparation Material: 10 If a party discovers it has inadvertently disclosed privileged or trial preparation material, it 11 agreestonotifytheopposingpartyinwritingwithin30daysofthediscoverythatsuchdocument(s) 12 have been disclosed, which written notification will set forth the basis for the claim that the items 13 disclosed are privileged or trial preparation material. If the party receiving the disclosure agrees that 14 the inadvertently produced items are privileged or trial preparation material, it will return all such 15 items to theproducing party without theretention of any copies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Complot v. Rushmore Servicing LLC, (D. Nev. 2024).

Complot v. Rushmore Servicing LLC (Complot v. Rushmore Servicing LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.