Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.
This text of 168 A.2d 809 (Complitano v. Steel & Alloy Tank Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is reversed for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.
Hall and Haneman, JJ., vote to affirm the judgment for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of judge Foley.
For reversal—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Jacobs, Francis, Proctor and Schettino—5.
For affirmance—Justices Hall and Haneman—2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A.2d 809, 34 N.J. 300, 1961 N.J. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/complitano-v-steel-alloy-tank-co-nj-1961.