Compensation of Banks v. State Accident Insurance Fund
This text of 607 P.2d 771 (Compensation of Banks v. State Accident Insurance Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this Workers’ Compensation case, the extent of claimant’s permanent disability depends upon the compensability of his headache and blackout spells. Our review of the record leads us to conclude that the referee’s evaluation of the evidence was correct, and that those symptoms were properly included in arriving at the extent of disability. The Board, therefore, should not have reduced the award. The question is a factual one and an extended opinion would serve no useful purpose. See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or App 103, 585 P2d 1149, rev den 284 Or 521 (1978).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
607 P.2d 771, 45 Or. App. 61, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 2550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compensation-of-banks-v-state-accident-insurance-fund-orctapp-1980.