Compeau v. Currier
738 N.W.2d 745, 480 Mich. 891
This text of 738 N.W.2d 745 (Compeau v. Currier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Compeau v. Currier, 738 N.W.2d 745, 480 Mich. 891 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Donna COMPEAU, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Robert M. CURRIER, D.O., and Robert M. Currier, D.O., P.C., a/k/a Northern Eye, Defendants-Appellants, and
Alpena General Hospital, Defendant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
738 N.W.2d 745, 480 Mich. 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compeau-v-currier-mich-2007.