Compass Bank v. Victor Nacim and Rachel Nacim

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Compass Bank v. Victor Nacim and Rachel Nacim. Read the opinion of the Court — 459 S.W.3d 95
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 2015·No. 08-12-00318-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§ COMPASS BANK, No. 08-12-00318-CV § Appellant, Appeal from § v. County Court at Law No. 3 § VICTOR NACIM AND of El Paso County, Texas RACHEL NACIM, § (TC # 2009-2946) Appellees. §

JUDGMENT

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that

Appellees recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see TEX.R.APP.P. 43.5, on the

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below for which let execution issue. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, Rodriguez, J., and Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge) Chew, C.J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Compass Bank v. Victor Nacim and Rachel Nacim, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Compass Bank v. Victor Nacim and Rachel Nacim (Compass Bank v. Victor Nacim and Rachel Nacim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.