Compas Med., P.C. v. Citiwide Auto Leasing
Opinion
against
Citiwide Auto Leasing, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered December 10, 2013. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
In support of its motion, defendant submitted an affidavit by its employee, who described the details of a record search which she had performed and stated that her search had revealed that there was no Citiwide Auto Leasing policy covering the vehicle in question on the date of the accident. We find that defendant's affidavit was sufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, that plaintiff's claim did not arise out of a covered incident (see Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos., 90 NY2d 195, 199 [1997]). As plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to defendant's motion, the Civil Court properly granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: October 11, 2016
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Compas Med., P.C. v. Citiwide Auto Leasing (Compas Med., P.C. v. Citiwide Auto Leasing) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.