Comparet v. Ewing

8 Blackf. 328, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 10
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 8 Blackf. 328 (Comparet v. Ewing) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comparet v. Ewing, 8 Blackf. 328, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 10 (Ind. 1847).

Opinion

Dewey, J.

This was an action of debt on a promissory note made by the defendant’s intestate, and dated September 17th, 1831, for 591 dollars and 76 cents, with interest from date. Pleas, nil debet, plene administravit, and accord and satisfaction; issues of fact upon these pleas; trial by the Court; judgment for the plaintiffs for 257 dollars and 41 cents in debt, and 80 dollars and 4 cents in damages, and for costs.

It appeared in evidence that on the 17th of December, 1838, the plaintiffs received the principal due by the note, and that the object of the suit was the recovery of the interest. We do not think the judgment of the Circuit Court can be sustained. If a creditor receive the principal sum due him, as such, there is nothing on which to sustain an after action: he cannot sue for the interest. Dixon v. Parkes, 1 Esp. R. 110.—Tillotson v. Preston, 3 Johns. R. 229.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marks v. Trustees of Purdue University
56 Ind. 288 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1877)
Robbins v. Cheek
32 Ind. 328 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1869)
City of Aurora v. West
22 Ind. 503 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)
White Water Valley Canal Co. v. Hawkins
4 Ind. 474 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1853)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Blackf. 328, 1847 Ind. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comparet-v-ewing-ind-1847.