Compania Transatlantica v. United States

51 F. Supp. 577, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2211
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Texas
DecidedApril 15, 1943
DocketNo. 1785
StatusPublished

This text of 51 F. Supp. 577 (Compania Transatlantica v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Compania Transatlantica v. United States, 51 F. Supp. 577, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2211 (S.D. Tex. 1943).

Opinion

KENNERLY, District Judge.

Statement of the Case.

This is a proceeding in Admiralty and a Libel filed March 11, 1943, by the Compania Trasatlántica, Administrada Por El Estado, administered by the Spanish State (for brevity called Libellant), against the Steamer or Steamship “Manuel Arnus” and the Todd Galveston Dry Docks, Inc., of Galveston, in this District and Division (for brevity called Respondents), in which Libellant seeks to recover possession of such Steamship from Respondents. The Government of the United States of America, appearing specially, has filed her petition, claming title to and possession of the Steamship, and prays that the Libel be dismissed and the Steamship released. Libellant answers and combats the Government’s petition. This is a hearing of the Government’s petition by agreement on Exhibits attached thereto and Exhibits attached to Libellant’s answer thereto.

Such Pleadings and Exhibits set forth the respective claims of title of Libellant and the Government. Libellant attacks the proceedings (Declaration of Abandonment, etc.) under which the Government claims that the Republic of Mexico acquired title to the Steamship, and says that neither the United States of America nor the Republic of Mexico has title thereto. The Government claims that this Court is without jurisdiction and may not inquire into the Declaration of Abandonment and other proceedings under which it is claimed that the Republic of Mexico acquire title.

Findings of Fact.

(a) The Pleadings and the Exhibits attached thereto show the respective Titles [578]*578of Libellant and of the Republic of Mexico. As early as on or about September 24, 1942, the United States of America began negotiations with the Republic of Mexico for the purchase of the Steamship, then in the Port of Vera Cruz, Mexico. Pursuant to such negotiations, the Steamship was brought to the docks of the Todd Galveston Dry Docks, Inc., at Galveston, Texas, in this jurisdiction. March 3, 1943, the Steamship was purchased' by the United States of America from the Republic of Mexico, and bill of sale executed, transferring title to the United States as of date September 24,' 1942.

Conclusions of Lana.

1. It is perfectly plain, in fact um-disputed, that on March 3, 1943, the United States of America purchased this Steamship from the Government of Mexico, and at the time of the filing of this Libel, March 11, 1943, was in possession thereof and claiming title thereto. The vessel was at that time at the docks of the Todd Galveston Dry Docks, Inc., at Galveston. Under these circumstances, such vessel is not amenable to process of this Court. United States v. Jardine, 5 Cir., 81 F.2d 745, 746; The Western Maid, 257 U. S. 419, 42 S.Ct. 159, 66 L.Ed. 299; 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq.

2. If the facts are as set forth by Libellant, this Court may not inquire into and determine the validity of the proceedings under which it is claimed by the United States of America that the Republic of Mexico acquired title to the Steamship. Underhill v. Hernandez, 168 U.S. 250, 18 S.Ct. 83, 42 L.Ed. 456; Oetjen v. Central Leather Co., 246 U.S. 297, 38 S.Ct. 309, 62 L.Ed. 726; Ricaud et al. v. American Metal Co., 246 U.S. 304, 38 S.Ct. 312, 62 L.Ed. 733; United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324, 57 S.Ct. 758, 81 L.Ed. 1134; Hewitt v. Speyer, 2 Cir., 250 F. 367; American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 213 U.S. 347, 29 S.Ct. 511, 53 L.Ed. 826, 16 Ann.Cas. 1047; Banco de Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank, 2 Cir., 114 F.2d 438; The Exchange, 7 Cranch. 116, 11 U.S. 116, 3 L.Ed. 287; The Navemar, 303 U.S. 68, 58 S.Ct. 432, 82 L.Ed. 667; Sullivan v. State of Sao Paulo, D. C., 36 F. Supp. 503.

It follows that the Libel must be dismissed, and the Steamship ordered delivered to the United States of America. Let a decree be drawn and presented accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon
11 U.S. 116 (Supreme Court, 1812)
Underhill v. Hernandez
168 U.S. 250 (Supreme Court, 1897)
American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.
213 U.S. 347 (Supreme Court, 1909)
Oetjen v. Central Leather Co.
246 U.S. 297 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Ricaud v. American Metal Co.
246 U.S. 304 (Supreme Court, 1918)
United States v. Belmont
301 U.S. 324 (Supreme Court, 1937)
Sullivan v. State of Sao Paulo
36 F. Supp. 503 (E.D. New York, 1941)
The Western Maid
257 U.S. 419 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Banco De Espana v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
114 F.2d 438 (Second Circuit, 1940)
United States v. Jardine
81 F.2d 745 (Fifth Circuit, 1935)
Ex parte United States
257 U.S. 419 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Hewitt v. Speyer
250 F. 367 (Second Circuit, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 F. Supp. 577, 1943 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compania-transatlantica-v-united-states-txsd-1943.