Compania Panamena De Seguros, S.A. v. Rod Pickard

354 F.2d 1004
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided January 20, 1966·No. 22083_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We conclude that the trial court correctly construed the written instrument of indemnity as not requiring reimbursement by appellee of the sums sued for.

As relates to claim by appellant for recovery of $10,000 received by appellee out of the sales commission, we conclude that this commission paid to an outside broker is not the “five per cent commission” referred to in the agreement, and Pickard’s agreement to waive his five per cent commission did not obligate him. to pay appellant the $10,000 which he was paid out of the broker’s commission.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Compania Panamena De Seguros, S.A. v. Rod Pickard, 354 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1966).

354 F.2d 1004 (Compania Panamena De Seguros, S.A. v. Rod Pickard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ernest Sniedzins v. United States
354 F.2d 1004 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)