Compania Panamena De Seguros, S.A. v. Rod Pickard

354 F.2d 1004
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 1966
Docket22083_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 354 F.2d 1004 (Compania Panamena De Seguros, S.A. v. Rod Pickard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Compania Panamena De Seguros, S.A. v. Rod Pickard, 354 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We conclude that the trial court correctly construed the written instrument of indemnity as not requiring reimbursement by appellee of the sums sued for.

As relates to claim by appellant for recovery of $10,000 received by appellee out of the sales commission, we conclude that this commission paid to an outside broker is not the “five per cent commission” referred to in the agreement, and Pickard’s agreement to waive his five per cent commission did not obligate him. to pay appellant the $10,000 which he was paid out of the broker’s commission.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ernest Sniedzins v. United States
354 F.2d 1004 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
354 F.2d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compania-panamena-de-seguros-sa-v-rod-pickard-ca5-1966.