Compania De Seguros Condor, S.A. v. Copenhagen Reinsurance Co. (U.K.)
879 So. 2d 1242, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5220, 2004 WL 784883
Opinion
We reverse determining the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the case. See Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499 (Fla.1989); Ganiko v. Ganiko, 826 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002); Christus St. Joseph’s Health Sys. v. Witt Biomedical Corp., 805 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Bruzzone Roldos v. Americargo Lines, Inc., 698 So.2d 1368 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Compania De Seguros Condor, S.A. v. Copenhagen Reinsurance Co. (U.K.), 879 So. 2d 1242, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5220, 2004 WL 784883 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
879 So. 2d 1242 (Compania De Seguros Condor, S.A. v. Copenhagen Reinsurance Co. (U.K.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bruzzone Roldos v. AMERICARGO LINES
698 So. 2d 1368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Ganiko v. Ganiko
826 So. 2d 391 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
CHRISTUS ST. JOSEPH'S v. Witt Biomedical Corp.
805 So. 2d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais
554 So. 2d 499 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)