Compagnie Generale Transatlantiquf v. McGoldrick

New York Court of Appeals

Compagnie Generale Transatlantiquf v. McGoldrick

21 N.E.2d 199, 280 N.Y. 691, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1505

DecidedApril 11, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 21 N.E.2d 199 (Compagnie Generale Transatlantiquf v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Compagnie Generale Transatlantiquf v. McGoldrick, 21 N.E.2d 199, 280 N.Y. 691, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1505 (N.Y. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto after the words “ be and the same hereby is affirmed with costs ” the following: “upon the sole ground that the City Sales Tax Law as here applied violates the commerce clause (article 1, section 8, clause 3) of the Constitution of the United States.” (See 279 N. Y. 192.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied and motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested, and when returned it will be amended by adding thereto after the words “ be and the same hereby is affirmed with costs ” the following: “upon the sole ground that the City Sales Tax Law as here applied violates the commerce clause (article 1, section 8, clause 3) of the Constitution of the United States.” (See 279 N. Y. 192.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 N.E.2d 199, 280 N.Y. 691, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/compagnie-generale-transatlantiquf-v-mcgoldrick-ny-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack