Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Manuel Kulukundis

277 F.2d 161, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5045
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 24, 1960·No. 25941·Published

Opinion

277 F.2d 161

COMPAGNIA DI NAVIGAZIONE MAURITIUS ROME, Libelant-Appellee,
v.
Manuel KULUKUNDIS and Intramar, S.A., Respondents-Appellees,
Paragon Oil Company, Inc. and Republic Tankers,
S.A., Respondents-Appellants.

No. 250, Docket 25941.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 7, 1960.
Decided March 24, 1960.

George J. Hammerman, New York City (Eli Ellis, Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City, on the brief), for respondents-appellants.

Allan A. Baillie, New York City (John H. Thoerner and Nelson, Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, on the brief), for libelant-appellee.

Sheldon A. Vogel, New York City (Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for respondents-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, WATERMAN and LEWIS,1 Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Moore, 182 F.Supp. 258.

1

Sitting by Designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Manuel Kulukundis, 277 F.2d 161, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5045 (2d Cir. 1960).

277 F.2d 161 (Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Manuel Kulukundis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Kulukundis
182 F. Supp. 258 (E.D. New York, 1959)