Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Manuel Kulukundis

Second Circuit

Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Manuel Kulukundis

277 F.2d 161, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5045

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMarch 24, 1960

Docket25941

StatusPublished

This text of 277 F.2d 161 (Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Manuel Kulukundis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Compagnia Di Navigazione Mauritius Rome v. Manuel Kulukundis, 277 F.2d 161, 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5045 (2d Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

277 F.2d 161

COMPAGNIA DI NAVIGAZIONE MAURITIUS ROME, Libelant-Appellee,
v.
Manuel KULUKUNDIS and Intramar, S.A., Respondents-Appellees,
Paragon Oil Company, Inc. and Republic Tankers,
S.A., Respondents-Appellants.

No. 250, Docket 25941.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 7, 1960.
Decided March 24, 1960.

George J. Hammerman, New York City (Eli Ellis, Hill, Betts & Nash, New York City, on the brief), for respondents-appellants.

Allan A. Baillie, New York City (John H. Thoerner and Nelson, Healy, Baillie & Burke, New York City, on the brief), for libelant-appellee.

Sheldon A. Vogel, New York City (Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief), for respondents-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, WATERMAN and LEWIS,1 Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of Judge Moore, 182 F.Supp. 258.

1

Sitting by Designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI