Comp. Prods. v. Pomeroy Select Integration

39 So. 3d 521
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 7, 2010
Docket4D09-2458
StatusPublished

This text of 39 So. 3d 521 (Comp. Prods. v. Pomeroy Select Integration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comp. Prods. v. Pomeroy Select Integration, 39 So. 3d 521 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

39 So.3d 521 (2010)

COMPUTER PRODUCTS AND SERVICES, INC., d/b/a CP & S, Inc., Appellant,
v.
POMEROY SELECT INTEGRATION SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellee.

No. 4D09-2458.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

July 7, 2010.

Sanford L. Bohrer and Scott D. Ponce of Holland & Knight LLP, Miami, for appellant.

Howard M. Camerik and Ronald J. Tomassi of GrayRobinson, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Computer Products and Services, Inc. appeals from the trial court's directed verdict *522 and final judgment in favor of appellee, Pomeroy Select Integration Solutions, Inc. As to the choice of law issue, we are unpersuaded by appellant's argument, and affirm. As to the entry of a directed verdict in appellee's favor, we affirm on the authority of James Crystal Licenses, LLC v. Infinity Radio Inc., ___ So.3d ___ (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

Affirmed.

POLEN, MAY, JJ., and GATES, MICHAEL L., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Computer Products & Services, Inc. v. Pomeroy Select Integration Solutions, Inc.
39 So. 3d 521 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 So. 3d 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comp-prods-v-pomeroy-select-integration-fladistctapp-2010.