Comora v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedMay 13, 2024
Docket22-1646V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Comora v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Comora v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comora v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 22-1646V

SAGE COMORA, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: April 12, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Daniel Alholm, Alholm Law PC, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner.

Michael Joseph Lang, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On November 4, 2022, Sage Comora filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) resulting from an influenza (“flu”) vaccine received in her left arm on September 29, 2021. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed April 11, 2024, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered in the United States, her injury lasted for more than six months, and neither Petitioner nor any other party has ever filed any action or received compensation in the form of an award or settlement for her vaccine-related injury. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 14-16; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, and further denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on April 11, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A. A lump sum of $25,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner; and

B. A lump sum of $1,101.31, representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to Petitioner by the State of Colorado, in the form of a check payable jointly to Petitioner and the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing.

Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing and send it to the following address:

Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing ATTN: Stephanie Monterroso 303 E. 17th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 State ID No. Y623686

Stipulation at ¶ 8. These amounts represent compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

SAGE COMORA, No. 22-1646V Petitioner, Chief Special Master Corcoran ECF v.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. Petitioner, Sage Comora, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l Oto -34 (the ·'Vaccine

Program''). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the --Table"), 42 C.F.R.

§ I 00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the influenza vaccine on or about September 29, 2021.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the table, or in the alternative, that

her alleged shoulder injury was caused by the vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she

experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the flu

vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, and further denies that the flu vaccine caused

petitioner to suffer from any other injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties neverthe less now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l (a)( I), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payments:

A. A lump sum of $25,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner; and

B. A lump sum of$1,10J.31, 1 representing reimbursement of a Medicaid lien for services rendered to petitioner by the State of Colorado, in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and the Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing.

Petitioner agrees to endorse this check to the Colorado Department of

Health Care Policy & Financing and send it to the following address:

Colorado Department of Health Care Policy & Financing ATTN: Stephanie Monterroso 303 E. 17th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 State ID No. Y623686

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Comora v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comora-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.