Comolli v. National Cash Register Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Comolli v. National Cash Register Co.

150 S.E. 551, 169 Ga. 409, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 372

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1929

DocketNo. 7306

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 150 S.E. 551 (Comolli v. National Cash Register Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Comolli v. National Cash Register Co., 150 S.E. 551, 169 Ga. 409, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 372 (Ga. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict rendered on the state of facts set out in the

certified question was not contrary to law. Wooten v. Nall, 18 Ga. 609 (7), 624; Francis v. Dickel, 68 Ga. 255 (2); Austin v. Appling, 88 Ga. 54, 59 (13 8. E. 955) ; Lippincott v. Behre, 122 Ga. 543, 546 (50 S. E. 467) ; Burson v. Shields, 160 Ga. 723, 730 (129 S. E. 22).

2. Even if it would have been better practice to have first amended the petition, the admission of the evidence was not reversible error. The verdict as rendered affected only that defendant as to whom the evidence was material and relevant; and therefore the result in the present instance is exactly the same as if the petition had been amended.

All the Justices concur. Z. B. Rogers, for plaintiff in error. Tutt & Brown and Clark Edwards Jr., contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilbert, J.

1. The verdict rendered on the state of facts set out in the

certified question was not contrary to law. Wooten v. Nall, 18 Ga. 609 (7), 624; Francis v. Dickel, 68 Ga. 255 (2); Austin v. Appling, 88 Ga. 54, 59 (13 8. E. 955) ; Lippincott v. Behre, 122 Ga. 543, 546 (50 S. E. 467) ; Burson v. Shields, 160 Ga. 723, 730 (129 S. E. 22).

2. Even if it would have been better practice to have first amended the petition, the admission of the evidence was not reversible error. The verdict as rendered affected only that defendant as to whom the evidence was material and relevant; and therefore the result in the present instance is exactly the same as if the petition had been amended.

All the Justices concur. Z. B. Rogers, for plaintiff in error. Tutt & Brown and Clark Edwards Jr., contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 S.E. 551, 169 Ga. 409, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comolli-v-national-cash-register-co-ga-1929.

Opinion

1. The verdict rendered on the state of facts set out in the

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack