Comoli v. State

63 A. 186, 78 Vt. 423, 1906 Vt. LEXIS 167
CourtSupreme Court of Vermont
DecidedFebruary 16, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 A. 186 (Comoli v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Comoli v. State, 63 A. 186, 78 Vt. 423, 1906 Vt. LEXIS 167 (Vt. 1906).

Opinion

RowELL, C. J.

It is considered that the newly discovered evidence attached to the petition would not be likely to produce a different result on another trial.

It is also' considered that the affidavits thereto attached do- not show the requisite diligence. They state only that the affiants “used due diligence,” which is only an opinion, upon which the Court cannot act. They should have stated the facts, that the Court might judge of the matter.

Petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hathorn
138 A. 738 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1927)
Ploof v. Putnam
76 A. 145 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1910)
Hemmenway v. Lincoln
73 A. 1073 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A. 186, 78 Vt. 423, 1906 Vt. LEXIS 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/comoli-v-state-vt-1906.