Community National Bank & Trust Co. v. Gold

45 A.D.2d 947, 359 N.Y.S.2d 118, 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 427, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4146
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 17, 1974
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 45 A.D.2d 947 (Community National Bank & Trust Co. v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Community National Bank & Trust Co. v. Gold, 45 A.D.2d 947, 359 N.Y.S.2d 118, 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 427, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 14, 1973, denying leave to renew a prior denied motion for accelerated judgment in an action on a negotiable instrument, pursuant to CPLR 3213, reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the motion to renew granted, and upon such renewal summary judgment is granted in plaintiff’s favor. The [948]*948defendant signed a promissory note payable to Michel Thorgevsky, her stepfather, now deceased. The loan funds came from the joint bank account of her mother and stepfather, although the funds derived from the mother. Defendant alleged a cancellation of the obligation by the mother, prior to her death and this later action. The original motion was properly denied because triable issues were raised. Thereafter, however, depositions established that the alleged cancellation by the mother was oral, and that the cheek for the loan was signed by the stepfather as drawer. A promissory note may not be effectively canceled by a simple oral statement. (Uniform Commercial Code, § 3-605; Bank of United States v. Manheim, 264 N. Y. 45, mot. for rearg. den. 264 N. Y. 511; Seaman-Andwall Corp. v. Wright Mach. Corp., 31 A D 2d 136.) Under the circumstances, there are no issues of fact for resolution, and so the motion to renew for accelerated judgment should now be granted. Concur—McGivern, P. J., Markewich, Kupferman and Capozzoli, JJ.; Nunez, J., dissents and votes to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Boston International v. Arguello Tefel
644 F. Supp. 1423 (E.D. New York, 1986)
Everton v. Blair
576 P.2d 585 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A.D.2d 947, 359 N.Y.S.2d 118, 15 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 427, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/community-national-bank-trust-co-v-gold-nyappdiv-1974.