Community Homes of Bismarck, Inc. v. Clooten
This text of 508 N.W.2d 364 (Community Homes of Bismarck, Inc. v. Clooten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff sought to evict the defendant from a housing project set aside for low income tenants. The basis for this complaint was alleged violation of the lease provision regarding unauthorized guests. The action was dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff attempts to appeal from this order of dismissal without prejudice.
“The right to appeal is a jurisdictional matter which we may consider sua sponte.” E.g., Johnson v. King, 325 N.W.2d 254, 256 (N.D.1982). This right to appeal is statutory. Id. Therefore, before we consider the merits of this appeal, we must have jurisdiction. E.g., Gast Constr. Co. v. Brighton Partnership, 422 N.W.2d 389, 390 (N.D.1988).
An order of dismissal without prejudice is not an appealable order under NDCC § 28-27-02. Runck v. Brakke, 421 N.W.2d 487, 488 (N.D.1988). “Because either side may commence another action, the order dismissing this action neither ‘determines the action’ nor ‘prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken.’ NDCC § 28-27-02(1).” Id. Consequently, due to lack of jurisdiction, this appeal must be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
508 N.W.2d 364, 1993 N.D. LEXIS 217, 1993 WL 469782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/community-homes-of-bismarck-inc-v-clooten-nd-1993.