Home/D.C. Circuit/Community Broadcasting Service, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mortimer Hendrickson and Vivian Eliza Hendrickson, Intervenors

Community Broadcasting Service, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mortimer Hendrickson and Vivian Eliza Hendrickson, Intervenors

377 F.2d 143, 126 U.S. App. D.C. 258, 9 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 2004, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7542
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedFebruary 6, 1967
Docket20384
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 377 F.2d 143 (Community Broadcasting Service, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mortimer Hendrickson and Vivian Eliza Hendrickson, Intervenors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Community Broadcasting Service, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Mortimer Hendrickson and Vivian Eliza Hendrickson, Intervenors, 377 F.2d 143, 126 U.S. App. D.C. 258, 9 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 2004, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7542 (D.C. Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Two applicants filed for an FM broadcast license in the same town. *144 The Commission set the applications for comparative hearing. The examiners took much evidence, considered numerous factors, and on balance, by a close margin, made the award. The Review Board also considered the many factors and reversed the examiners. The Commission modified the Board’s findings in several respects and affirmed as modified. The problem is the correctness of the award. On the record here presented, this problem rests within the sound expert judgment of the Commission. Appellant says the statement of issues in the order of the Commission designating the issues to be heard did not include one as to diversification of mass media, an issue regarded as important by the Review Board. Appellant did not include that point in its appeal from the Review Board to the Commission; so it cannot raise it here. We find no basis upon which a court could disturb the Commission’s decision.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry Geller v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., Intervenor
610 F.2d 973 (D.C. Circuit, 1979)
National Citizens Committee for Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Elyria-Lorain Broadcasting Co., Intervenors. Owosso Broadcasting Company, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Ksl, Inc., Intervenor. National Association of Broadcasters v. Federal Communications Commission and the United States of America, Ksl, Inc., Intervenor. Wjag, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Whas, Inc., Louisiana Television Broadcasting Corp., Intervenors. The Ogden Newspapers, Inc. v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Ksl, Inc., Intervenor (Two Cases). Daily Telegraph Printing Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Whas, Inc., Louisiana Television Broadcasting Corporation, Ksl, Inc., Intervenors. American Newspaper Publishers Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ksl, Inc., Intervenor. The Brockway Company v. United States of America and Federal Communications Commission, Ksl, Inc., Intervenor. Gray Communications Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ksl, Inc., Intervenor
555 F.2d 938 (D.C. Circuit, 1977)
The Associated Press v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Western Union Telegraph Co., American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors. Aerospace Industries Association of America, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Western Union Telegraph Co., American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors. Air Transport Association of America v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Western Union Telegraph Co., Bethlehem Steel Corporation, American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Western Union Telegraph Co., American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors. Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Western Union Telegraph Co., American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors. National Association of Motor Bus Owners v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, the Western Union Telegraph Co., American Telephone and Telegraph Co., Intervenors. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
448 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
Associated Press v. Federal Communications Commission
448 F.2d 1095 (D.C. Circuit, 1971)
L. B. Wilson, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Coral Television Corporation, Intervenor
397 F.2d 717 (D.C. Circuit, 1968)
Southern California Edison Company v. Federal Power Commission
387 F.2d 619 (Third Circuit, 1968)
Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Power Commission
387 F.2d 619 (Third Circuit, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
377 F.2d 143, 126 U.S. App. D.C. 258, 9 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 2004, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/community-broadcasting-service-inc-v-federal-communications-commission-cadc-1967.