Commonwealth v. Zoltowski
This text of 92 A. 496 (Commonwealth v. Zoltowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted in the court below of murder, of the second degree. The first two assignments of error complain of the charge of the court as being misleading and unfair. It covers fifty-eight pages of printed matter, and we have not been persuaded that the learned judge failed to fully instruct the jury on any feature of the case, or that the charge is open to the criticism contained in the second assignment. The remaining seven assignments, complaining of rulings on offers of evidence, and of the refusal to allow a question asked a juror on his voir dire, are equally without merit, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 A. 496, 246 Pa. 410, 1914 Pa. LEXIS 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-zoltowski-pa-1914.