Commonwealth v. Zimmerman

395 A.2d 1018, 261 Pa. Super. 491

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Zimmerman. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 Pa. Super. 286 →

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 3, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 1810·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Finding the pro se document filed on June 10, 1977, to be effective as a petition to withdraw appellant’s guilty plea, we remand this case to the lower court for a hearing and determination of that issue. Appellant may, if the determination be adverse, appeal such order.

WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

WATKINS, former P. J., and HOFFMAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Commonwealth v. Zimmerman, 395 A.2d 1018, 261 Pa. Super. 491 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

395 A.2d 1018 (Commonwealth v. Zimmerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.