Commonwealth v. Zellers

391 A.2d 706, 258 Pa. Super. 644
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 12, 1978·No. Appeal, No. 998·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

HOFFMAN and SPAETH, JJ., dissented on the basis that the lower court did not comply with Pa.R.Crim.P. 1123(c) in that it did not inform appellant of the necessity of filing specific motions in order to preserve his claims for appellate review. Commonwealth v. Cathey, 477 Pa. 446, 384 A.2d 589 (1978); Commonwealth v. Miller, 469 Pa. 370, 366 A.2d 220 (1976); Commonwealth v. Brown, 248 Pa.Super. 289, 375 A.2d 102 (1977). Specifically, the lower court found appellant guilty, and immediately sentenced him without informing him of any of his appellate rights. See pages 39-41 of transcript (reproduced as Appendix D of appellant’s brief).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Zellers, 391 A.2d 706, 258 Pa. Super. 644 (Pa. Ct. App. 1978).

391 A.2d 706 (Commonwealth v. Zellers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Cathey
384 A.2d 589 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1978)
Commonwealth v. Miller
366 A.2d 220 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Commonwealth v. Brown
375 A.2d 102 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)