Commonwealth v. Zeid

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Zeid

211 A.2d 285, 206 Pa. Super. 13, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 754

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 17, 1965·No. Appeals, 108, 109, and 110·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment of sentence is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Griffith, as reported in 36 Pa. D. & C. 2d 101, and the appellant-defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment of sentence is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge Griffith, as reported in 36 Pa. D. & C. 2d 101, and the appellant-defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.

Commonwealth v. Zeid, 211 A.2d 285, 206 Pa. Super. 13, 1965 Pa. Super. LEXIS 754 (Pa. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

211 A.2d 285 (Commonwealth v. Zeid) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related