Commonwealth v. Yuhasz

899 A.2d 342
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Yuhasz. Read the opinion of the Court — 592 Pa. 120
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 9, 2006·No. No. 1081 MAL 2005·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of May 2006, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to:

Whether the sentence imposed in this case pursuant to Pennsylvania’s indeterminate sentencing scheme, which was within the statutory maximum but exceeded the aggravated range of the Sentencing Guidelines, violates the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution in light of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004) because the sentencing judge relied upon conduct not admitted in petitioner’s guilty plea?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Yuhasz, 899 A.2d 342 (Pa. 2006).

899 A.2d 342 (Commonwealth v. Yuhasz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)