Commonwealth v. Young

370 A.2d 1221, 246 Pa. Super. 340, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1938
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 3, 1977·No. No. 1692·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This case is remanded for completion of the record by inclusion of a transcript of the testimony at the March 11, 1975, hearing on appellant’s petition for post-conviction relief.

On remand, the hearing judge shall make a finding on whether appellant’s claims are moot, and also on whether appellant was denied his right to appeal from his 1950 convictions. If the judge determines either that the claims are moot or that appellant was not denied his right to appeal, he shall deny relief. However, if he determines that the claims are not moot and that appellant was denied his right to appeal, he shall grant appellant the right to file post-trial motions nunc pro tunc. See Commonwealth v. Westbrook, 245 Pa.Super. 174, 369 A. 2d 350 (1976).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Young, 370 A.2d 1221, 246 Pa. Super. 340, 1977 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1938 (Pa. Ct. App. 1977).

370 A.2d 1221 (Commonwealth v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Speaks
416 A.2d 101 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)