Commonwealth v. Young
223 A.2d 527, 208 Pa. Super. 478, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 871
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 25, 1966·No. Appeals, Nos. 561 and 562·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
Opinion
The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of sentence of the court below is affirmed. The defendant is directed to appear in the court below at such time as he may be there called, and that he be by that court committed until he has complied with the sentence, or any part of it which had not been performed at the time the appeal was made a supersedeas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Commonwealth v. Young, 223 A.2d 527, 208 Pa. Super. 478, 1966 Pa. Super. LEXIS 871 (Pa. Ct. App. 1966).
223 A.2d 527 (Commonwealth v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Westcott
523 A.2d 1140 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Commonwealth v. Holloway
223 A.2d 529 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1966)