Commonwealth v. Woody

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Woody

959 A.2d 905

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Woody. Read the opinion of the Court — 601 Pa. 482 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 23, 2008·No. 143 MAL 2008·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does the Superior Court order reversing and vacating Respondent’s conviction for escape conflict with prior decisions of this Honorable Court and prior decisions of panels of the Superior Court, as well as the plain language of the governing statute, by adding an element to the offense of escape?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Does the Superior Court order reversing and vacating Respondent’s conviction for escape conflict with prior decisions of this Honorable Court and prior decisions of panels of the Superior Court, as well as the plain language of the governing statute, by adding an element to the offense of escape?

Commonwealth v. Woody, 959 A.2d 905 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

959 A.2d 905 (Commonwealth v. Woody) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.