Commonwealth v. Woods

260 A.2d 202, 216 Pa. Super. 758, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1027
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 4, 1969·No. Appeal, No. 227·Published

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam :

In accordance with the opinion of the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Hoffman, 426 Pa. 226, 232 A. 2d 623 (1967), the order is vacated and the record remanded to the court below with instructions to appoint counsel to represent appellant in a post-conviction proceeding at which his eligibility for an evidentiary hearing and/or other relief may be determined. See Rule 1503 of Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Woods, 260 A.2d 202, 216 Pa. Super. 758, 1969 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1027 (Pa. Ct. App. 1969).

260 A.2d 202 (Commonwealth v. Woods) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Hoffman
232 A.2d 623 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1967)