Commonwealth v. Wisneski

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Wisneski

991 A.2d 881, 605 Pa. 461, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 597

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 30, 2010·No. 316 WAL 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

*462 Where a motorist drives through the scene of a fatal accident and strikes the body of the accident victim, does the Commonwealth establish a prim a facie case against the motorist for violating his duties to stop and render aid at the scene of the accident, if the Commonwealth is unable to prove that the victim was alive at the moment of the motorist’s impact?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

*462 Where a motorist drives through the scene of a fatal accident and strikes the body of the accident victim, does the Commonwealth establish a prim a facie case against the motorist for violating his duties to stop and render aid at the scene of the accident, if the Commonwealth is unable to prove that the victim was alive at the moment of the motorist’s impact?

Commonwealth v. Wisneski, 991 A.2d 881, 605 Pa. 461, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 597 (Pa. 2010).

Pincite

991 A.2d 881 (Commonwealth v. Wisneski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related