Commonwealth v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Wilson

889 A.2d 38, 585 Pa. 461, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2744

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 7, 2005

DocketPetition No. 261 MAL 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 889 A.2d 38 (Commonwealth v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Wilson, 889 A.2d 38, 585 Pa. 461, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2744 (Pa. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

[462]*462 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2005, the Motion for Immediate Hearing on Bail is DENIED. Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. Whether sentence enhancement evidence may be presented for the first time at resentencing upon remand.

2. Whether punishment in a criminal case involving a single count constitutes a sentencing “scheme.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[462]*462 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2005, the Motion for Immediate Hearing on Bail is DENIED. Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issues:

1. Whether sentence enhancement evidence may be presented for the first time at resentencing upon remand.

2. Whether punishment in a criminal case involving a single count constitutes a sentencing “scheme.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

889 A.2d 38, 585 Pa. 461, 2005 Pa. LEXIS 2744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-wilson-pa-2005.