Commonwealth v. Wilson
670 A.2d 640
This text of 670 A.2d 640 (Commonwealth v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Wilson, 670 A.2d 640 (Pa. 1996).
Opinion
AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the issues of (1) whether the victims’ prior inconsistent statements were admissible as contemporaneous, verbatim recordings under Commonwealth v. Lively, 530 Pa. 464, 610 A.2d 7 (1992); and (2) whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to hearsay testimony.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Lively
610 A.2d 7 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
670 A.2d 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-wilson-pa-1996.