Commonwealth v. Whitmarsh
This text of 21 Mass. 233 (Commonwealth v. Whitmarsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant was convicted upon an indictment founded on St. 1804, c. 120, § 2, for possessing at one time a number not less than ten, of similar counterfeit bank-bills, with intent to pass them. The evidence at the trial was, that the bank bills were of different dates, and Beal, in behalf of the defendant, objected that they were therefore not similar, but on the authority of Brown v. Commonwealth, 8 Mass. R. 69, the Court overruled the objection.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 Mass. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-whitmarsh-mass-1826.