Commonwealth v. West

12 Ky. Op. 132, 4 Ky. L. Rptr. 984, 1883 Ky. LEXIS 170
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedMay 5, 1883
StatusPublished

This text of 12 Ky. Op. 132 (Commonwealth v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. West, 12 Ky. Op. 132, 4 Ky. L. Rptr. 984, 1883 Ky. LEXIS 170 (Ky. Ct. App. 1883).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Hines :

This is a proceeding on a bond in a case of bastardy in which it is sought to hold the surety on the bond, conditioned for the appearance of the accused and to perform such judgment as the court might render, responsible for failing to satisfy a judgment against the accused when he had appeared in court.

This question was fully discussed in the case of Runner v. Commonwealth, 78 Ky. 556, 1 Ky. L. 257, in which it was held that such a bond was an obligation on the sureties for the appearance of the accused, and, consequently, that such an appearance satisfied the covenants in the bond. In that case, the case of the Commonwealth v. Douglas, 11 Bush (Ky.) 607, holding a contrary view, was expressly overruled. We see no reason for altering the conclusion at which we arrived in the Runner case, and, therefore, affirm the judgment of the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Douglas
74 Ky. 607 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1876)
Runner v. Commonwealth
78 Ky. 556 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Ky. Op. 132, 4 Ky. L. Rptr. 984, 1883 Ky. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-west-kyctapp-1883.