Commonwealth v. Weigle

12 A.3d 749, 608 Pa. 563, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Commonwealth v. Weigle. Read the opinion of the Court — 606 Pa. 234
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 2, 2011·No. Appeal, No. 481 WAL 2010·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of March, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The Order of the Superi- or Court is vacated, in part. Petitioner’s direct appeal rights from the trial court’s denial of PCRA relief are reinstated nunc pro tunc, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court for disposition on the merits. The Application for Appointment of Counsel is GRANTED. The Superior Court shall remand this matter to the trial court for the appointment [564]*564of counsel, retaining jurisdiction of the matter while that appointment is effectuated.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Weigle, 12 A.3d 749, 608 Pa. 563, 2011 Pa. LEXIS 499 (Pa. 2011).

12 A.3d 749 (Commonwealth v. Weigle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.