Commonwealth v. Weeden, A., Pet
This text of Commonwealth v. Weeden, A., Pet (Commonwealth v. Weeden, A., Pet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : No. 196 WAL 2021 : Respondent : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : ANGELO WEEDEN, : : Petitioner :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether a “Shotspotter Investigative Lead Summary” written report, which purports to show the time and location of a shooting incident and was offered as substantive evidence to the jury at trial, is testimonial in nature and subject to the protections afforded under the Confrontation Clause enshrined in the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 9 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Commonwealth v. Weeden, A., Pet, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-weeden-a-pet-pa-2022.