Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Commonwealth v. Way

Commonwealth v. Way

353 A.2d 31, 466 Pa. 287, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 468
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 17, 1976
DocketAppeal No. 90
StatusPublished

This text of 353 A.2d 31 (Commonwealth v. Way) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Way, 353 A.2d 31, 466 Pa. 287, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 468 (Pa. 1976).

Opinions

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

The order of the trial court suppressing appellee’s statements because of violations of Rule 130 of Pa.R. of Crim.P., is affirmed.

JONES, C. J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. POMEROY, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which EAGEN, J., joins.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Dutton
307 A.2d 238 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Commonwealth v. Futch
290 A.2d 417 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
353 A.2d 31, 466 Pa. 287, 1976 Pa. LEXIS 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-way-pa-1976.