Commonwealth v. Washington

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Washington

306 A.2d 877, 453 Pa. 613, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 713

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 2, 1973·No. Appeal, No. 102·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment of sentence is vacated and the record is remanded with instructions that appellant be resentenced in accordance with The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of April 14, 1972, P. L. 165, 35 P.S. §§780-101 et seq. (Supp. 1973). Commonwealth v. Thomas, 450 Pa. 548, 554-56, 301 A. 2d 359, 363-64 (1973); Commonwealth v. Simpson, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 296, 303, 294 A. 2d 805, 808 (1972).

Mr. Chief Justice Jones took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment of sentence is vacated and the record is remanded with instructions that appellant be resentenced in accordance with The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, Act of April 14, 1972, P. L. 165, 35 P.S. §§780-101 et seq. (Supp. 1973). Commonwealth v. Thomas, 450 Pa. 548, 554-56, 301 A. 2d 359, 363-64 (1973); Commonwealth v. Simpson, 222 Pa. Superior Ct. 296, 303, 294 A. 2d 805, 808 (1972).

Mr. Chief Justice Jones took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Commonwealth v. Washington, 306 A.2d 877, 453 Pa. 613, 1973 Pa. LEXIS 713 (Pa. 1973).

Pincite

306 A.2d 877 (Commonwealth v. Washington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related