Commonwealth v. Ward
This text of 393 A.2d 21 (Commonwealth v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This is a direct appeal from a conviction of voluntary manslaughter in which the following contentions have been raised:
(a) Since “no aggravating circumstances” were alleged in the indictment the Commonwealth improperly attempted to suggest on voir dire that it was seeking the death penalty;
[512]*512(b) That the court erred in stating to the jury, in its opening remarks, that they (the jury) should not concern themselves with the penalty;
(c) That the court erred in discussing in the charge its view of the legislative intent of section 1311(b), 18 Pa.C.S.A. 1311(b) (Supp.1978-79);
(d) That the trial court erred in its charge on the duty to retreat;
(e) That the trial court erred in restricting the defense in developing the disposition of the victim;
(f) That the trial court improperly permitted the admission of a prior conviction for larceny of appellant for impeachment purposes.
We have reviewed these issues and find them to be without merit.
Judgment of sentence affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
393 A.2d 21, 481 Pa. 510, 1978 Pa. LEXIS 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ward-pa-1978.