Commonwealth v. Ward-Green, L.
164 A.3d 462, 2016 WL 7386799, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2842
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 21, 2016
Docket272 WAL 2016 (Granted)
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases
This text of 164 A.3d 462 (Commonwealth v. Ward-Green, L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Ward-Green, L., 164 A.3d 462, 2016 WL 7386799, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2842 (Pa. 2016).
Opinion
*463 ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by petitioner are:
(1) Whether the exception to the timeliness requirement of the PCRA for after-discovered facts requires the petitioner to file her PCRA Petition before verifying unknown, but suspected, facts through expert analysis.
(2) Whether the Court of Common Pleas’ determination of the deadline to file a PCRA petition for after-discovered evidence is entitled to deference by the Superior Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Com. v. Jones, G.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Rivera, M.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Com. v. Strickland, D.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2017
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
164 A.3d 462, 2016 WL 7386799, 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-ward-green-l-pa-2016.