Commonwealth v. Wallace

123 Mass. 400, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 306
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Ames, J.

There was evidence to the effect that the defendant kept a place of business consisting of two rooms, in one of which was a counter and a few cigars with tables and chairs ; that the place was one of common resort; that on being arrested at that place he tried to conceal a bottle containing intoxicating liquor in his pocket, and afterwards, and while under arrest, he threw it away; and that, a few days after his arrest, he made an attempt to bribe the officer who arrested him. These proceedings on his part were competent evidence against him. In most criminal cases a portion of the evidence consists of the conduct and deportment of the accused party at and after the time of the charge. Thus flight, concealment, the use of falsehoods or evasions, are all matters which the jury have a right to look upon as unfavorable and suspicious. Roscoe Grim. Ev. (7th Am. ed.) 18. The evidence admitted was all of it competent and material. Its weight and effect were for the jury to estimate, and °we cannot say that it was not sufficient to justify their verdict.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Wallace, 123 Mass. 400, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 306 (Mass. 1877).

123 Mass. 400 (Commonwealth v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Mercier
153 N.E. 834 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
Commonwealth v. Min Sing
88 N.E. 918 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Commonwealth v. Acton
42 N.E. 329 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)