Commonwealth v. Wagner
This text of 84 Pa. Super. 254 (Commonwealth v. Wagner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted with appellant in No. 80, April Term, 1925, (Com. v. Neff), in which an opinion has this day been filed affirming the conviction. The record shows that appellant was seen on Piper’s Hill with other appellants, but not at the scene of the affray; there is no evidence to connect him with the offenses of which he was convicted; we must therefore sustain his appeal.
Judgment reversed and reeord remitted with instructions to discharge appellant.
Similar judgments were rendered in the eases of
Commonwealth v. Sliter, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 84;
Commonwealth v. Koontz, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 89.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 Pa. Super. 254, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-wagner-pasuperct-1924.