Commonwealth v. Wagner

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Wagner

84 Pa. Super. 254, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 263

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 17, 1924·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Appellant was convicted with appellant in No. 80, April Term, 1925, (Com. v. Neff), in which an opinion has this day been filed affirming the conviction. The record shows that appellant was seen on Piper’s Hill with other appellants, but not at the scene of the affray; there is no evidence to connect him with the offenses of which he was convicted; we must therefore sustain his appeal.

Judgment reversed and reeord remitted with instructions to discharge appellant.

Similar judgments were rendered in the eases of

Commonwealth v. Sliter, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 84;

Commonwealth v. Koontz, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 89.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Appellant was convicted with appellant in No. 80, April Term, 1925, (Com. v. Neff), in which an opinion has this day been filed affirming the conviction. The record shows that appellant was seen on Piper’s Hill with other appellants, but not at the scene of the affray; there is no evidence to connect him with the offenses of which he was convicted; we must therefore sustain his appeal.

Judgment reversed and reeord remitted with instructions to discharge appellant.

Similar judgments were rendered in the eases of

Commonwealth v. Sliter, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 84;

Commonwealth v. Koontz, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 89.

Commonwealth v. Wagner, 84 Pa. Super. 254, 1924 Pa. Super. LEXIS 263 (Pa. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

84 Pa. Super. 254 (Commonwealth v. Wagner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.