Commonwealth v. Vugrinovich

37 Pa. D. & C.2d 739, 1965 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 312
Washington County Court of Quarter Sessions·Decided September 2, 1965·No. nos. 4 and 5·Published

Opinions

Sweet, P. J.,

Michael A. Vugrinovich, a defendant in a summary proceeding before this court, charged with reckless driving and too fast for conditions, has petitioned for the appointment of counsel.

His request is refused. Since this is the first application for the appointment of counsel in a summary proceeding, it seems expedient to set forth the reasons for this refusal.

Long before Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335 (1963), it was the custom in this county for the court to appoint counsel for indigents charged with certain felonies or misdemeanors. That such practice is now essential cannot be doubted, but must the taxpayers also bear the cost of defending summary offenders, most of them charged with violations of The Vehicle Code?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Commonwealth v. Vugrinovich, 37 Pa. D. & C.2d 739, 1965 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 312 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965).

37 Pa. D. & C.2d 739 (Commonwealth v. Vugrinovich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Maisenhelder v. Rundle
198 A.2d 565 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Commonwealth v. Bergen
4 A.2d 164 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Commonwealth ex rel. McCray v. Rundle
202 A.2d 303 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1964)
Gideon v. Wainwright
372 U.S. 335 (Supreme Court, 1963)