Commonwealth v. Velazco-Mena

89 A.3d 656
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 14, 2014
StatusPublished

This text of 89 A.3d 656 (Commonwealth v. Velazco-Mena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Velazco-Mena, 89 A.3d 656 (Pa. 2014).

Opinion

[657]*657 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2014, the Petition for Alowance of Appeal is GRANTED, limited to the following issue as stated by Petitioner:

Whether the trial court erred in imposing the mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to 42 Pa.C.S. 9712.1(a) over the [Petitioner’s] objection on the grounds that the firearm in question was not found “in close proximity” to the drugs found in Petitioner’s residence?

The Superior Court’s decision affirming the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence under Section 9712.1 is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for further proceedings in light of Commonwealth v. Hanson, — Pa. -, 82 A.3d 1023 (2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Hanson
82 A.3d 1023 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.3d 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-velazco-mena-pa-2014.