Commonwealth v. V.A.M.
991 A.2d 884, 605 Pa. 467, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 610
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 31, 2010
DocketNo. 527 EAL 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 991 A.2d 884 (Commonwealth v. V.A.M.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Commonwealth v. V.A.M., 991 A.2d 884, 605 Pa. 467, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 610 (Pa. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 31st day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by the Petitioner, is:
Did Superior Court err in a matter of first impression where a divided panel in a published opinion: 1) reversed the Common Pleas Court and ordered that [Respondent’s] criminal record for rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, conspiracy, and related charges be destroyed; 2) denied that the Common Pleas Court had applied the legal standard set forth in its Rule 1925(a) opinion; and 3) ordered expungement on the extraordinary rationale that it did not know whether the Common Pleas Court was aware of the evidence of record?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Commonwealth v. Moto
23 A.3d 989 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2011)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
991 A.2d 884, 605 Pa. 467, 2010 Pa. LEXIS 610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-vam-pa-2010.