Commonwealth v. Upsher
This text of 435 A.2d 178 (Commonwealth v. Upsher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Judgment of Sentence entered at No. CC7804637 is affirmed. The Judgment of Sentence entered at No. CC7804699 (the robbery charge) made to run consecutive with the sentence at No. CC7804637 is vacated for the reasons set forth in Commonwealth v. Tarver, 493 Pa. 320, 426 A.2d 569 (1981).
Mr. Justice Larsen and Mr. Justice Kauffman dissent in that they would affirm the judgment of sentence entered at No. CC7804699 for reasons set forth in Commonwealth v. Tarver, 493 Pa. 320, 426 A.2d at 575 (1981) (Larsen, J. dissenting joined by Kauffman, J.).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 A.2d 178, 495 Pa. 620, 1981 Pa. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-upsher-pa-1981.