Commonwealth v. Trainor

123 Mass. 414, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 313
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 28, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 123 Mass. 414 (Commonwealth v. Trainor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Commonwealth v. Trainor, 123 Mass. 414, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 313 (Mass. 1877).

Opinion

Norfolk.

Complaint under the St. of 1875, e. 99, charging the defendant with a single sale of intoxicating liquor to “ Andrew D Rooney.”

The defendant requested the judge to rule as follows: “ 1. A mistake in the name of the person to whom the alleged sale was made is a fatal variance. 2. Rooney should be described in the [415]*415complaint by his true Christian name, which is Andrew, and not Andrew D. A fictitious Christian name is not sufficient. 3. The Christian name is that part of one’s name which precedes the surname, and it is the name given at the time of baptism. 4. Rooney inserted the letter D. between his surname and his Christian name without any legal right or authority whatever, and consequently is not described in the complaint by his true Christian name, as the law requires. 5. After a person is christened and baptized by a name, and he adopts and becomes known by that name, and none other, the name by which he was so christened and baptized and known is his true Christian name. 6. A person can change no part of his true name only by due process of law. 7. There is a fatal variance between the allegations in the complaint and the evidence as to the true name of the person to whom the alleged sale was made. 8. The testimony of Rooney should be considered with great care by the jury.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Azer
31 N.E.2d 549 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Gould v. McMahon
2 Mass. App. Div. 113 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1937)
Burke v. United States
58 F.2d 739 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)
Larson v. State
186 N.W. 981 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1922)
State v. Bouchard
149 P. 464 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1915)
State v. Whiteneck
96 N.E. 156 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)
State v. Myrberg
105 P. 622 (Washington Supreme Court, 1909)
Young v. Jewell
87 N.E. 604 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
State v. Van Tassel
72 N.W. 497 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1897)
Commonwealth v. Seeley
45 N.E. 91 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Brady v. Cassidy
29 N.Y.S. 45 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
State v. Burchard
57 N.W. 491 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1894)
Martin v. State
46 N.W. 618 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1890)
Commonwealth v. Ingersoll
13 N.E. 613 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1887)
People v. Leong Quong
60 Cal. 107 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
State v. Schweiter
27 Kan. 499 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 Mass. 414, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-trainor-mass-1877.