Commonwealth v. Toro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Toro

87 A.3d 316, 624 Pa. 616, 2014 WL 959571, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 681

DecidedMarch 12, 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A.3d 316 (Commonwealth v. Toro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Toro, 87 A.3d 316, 624 Pa. 616, 2014 WL 959571, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 681 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is: Whether Superior Court erred because it affirmed the PCRA court but for different reasons; namely, that the [petition was untimely and this determination was made sua sponte by the Superior Court but is erroneous because the issues being adjudicated were raised in a timely PCRA but subsequent PCRA’s [sic] were filed for procedural defects of the Common Pleas Court or abandonment by prior PCRA counsel?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 12th day of March, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is: Whether Superior Court erred because it affirmed the PCRA court but for different reasons; namely, that the [petition was untimely and this determination was made sua sponte by the Superior Court but is erroneous because the issues being adjudicated were raised in a timely PCRA but subsequent PCRA’s [sic] were filed for procedural defects of the Common Pleas Court or abandonment by prior PCRA counsel?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.3d 316, 624 Pa. 616, 2014 WL 959571, 2014 Pa. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-toro-pa-2014.