Commonwealth v. Todaro

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Commonwealth v. Todaro

688 A.2d 165, 547 Pa. 2, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 2510

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedDecember 20, 1996

DocketPetition No. 169 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1996

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 688 A.2d 165 (Commonwealth v. Todaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Commonwealth v. Todaro, 688 A.2d 165, 547 Pa. 2, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 2510 (Pa. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED BUT LIMITED to the question of whether the Superior Court erred by denying Petitioner’s PCRA petition alleging that counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the submission of written instructions to the jury.

It is further ordered that the case be submitted on briefs and consolidated with Commonwealth v. Skibicki, 547 Pa. 1, 688 A.2d 165 (1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 1996, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED BUT LIMITED to the question of whether the Superior Court erred by denying Petitioner’s PCRA petition alleging that counsel was ineffective by failing to object to the submission of written instructions to the jury.

It is further ordered that the case be submitted on briefs and consolidated with Commonwealth v. Skibicki, 547 Pa. 1, 688 A.2d 165 (1996).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 A.2d 165, 547 Pa. 2, 1996 Pa. LEXIS 2510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/commonwealth-v-todaro-pa-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack